Loading page content
Loading page content
A sitewide link is repeated across a template so nearly every URL on the host points to the same destination. Legitimate examples include a partner credit in a footer. Spammy examples include hacked sidebars and paid network footers stuffed with commercial anchors.
Sitewide placements multiply URL-level backlink counts from one referring domain. Raw link totals look huge even when the underlying decision is a single template edit. Auditors who chase URL volume miss that fixing or disavowing the domain is usually the right unit of work.
Google evaluates manipulative sitewide links in the context of link spam policies. Editorial sitewide credits are not automatically toxic. Context and intent matter.
In referring-domain reports, sitewide spam often looks like:
Hack cleanups often remove sitewide spam at the template layer. If you do not control the host, contact the owner or host with a clear URL sample. Counting every templated URL as a separate crisis only inflates the drama.
In a scan, collapse sitewide rows to the referring domain first. One footer across thousands of URLs is usually one decision: ignore, request a template fix, or, rarely, consider a later disavow draft if the network is clearly spam and you cannot get it removed. Google still says most sites should not use the disavow tool.
Run a free scan
Paste a domain, review spam-flagged referring domains, and export CSV or a disavow draft after human review.
toxic backlink checkerPaste a domain and review spam-flagged referring domains with human judgment, not automatic cleanup.